supabamman's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[The Breach]

When first playing this game I was blown away by how much effort was put into just the atmosphere of the game. The Breach is both creepy and disgusting. But not only that, it was just fun to play. With references to Dead Space and Doom, as well as Metroid, with all of the doors and side-scrolling. This game is my favorite shooter on Newgrounds so far.

[Fishy Rush]

Now this is one of those games that makes me glad that Flappy Birds was created. When people take such a simple concept and try to do something unique with it instead of copying it with a different skin, that is when I feel that a game has now effort put into it. This game was fun and addictive, which is very good for flash games. Flash games should not be something that you play for 3 seconds and get bored of. Love this game.

SilenGames responds:

Many thanks for comment and playing the game!

[Spot the Difference 2]

I did not like this game. I mean it was just bad. I felt that at any moment a fucking screamer was going to appear. And if it is a legit spot the difference game, then there are some definate problems that need to be fixed. A) Don't make the differences microscopic. I stared at the screen for 3 minutes, not one correct answer. I felt dumber and dumber the more I played. Although to be fair, I am not extremely intelligent. B) Why did everything look so bland. I mean if you are going to make a game. Put some kind of effort into it. Standard fonts, music that plays on an endless fucking loop. It just seems lazy. And lastly, just a nit pic that I need to address. Please stop making spot the difference games. They aren't fun. At least the game works for the most part. Half star!

[Flap in a Gap]

You ever look at a game and know exactly what its going to be. Well this is not one of those situations. This game looked like it was just another flappy bird rip off. (Well, it kinda is but in a good way.) Not only is it addictively frustrating, but it also just fun to play. It kills time, it doesn't take much thought. Which is good for some games. So all in all, not bad.

SoftWarewolf responds:

Thanks, appreciate that!
i thought making it look similiar would be an advantage, but i am pretty sure that was dead wrong, many people see it as another clone and immediately hates it. I should make a different version that looks and feels completely different.

[MAF-III]

Let me start by saying that I get what this game is trying to do. That being said, this game was just not good. That sounds mean and I don't mean for it to be but in my honest opinion this game... not good. First of all, everything about the game looks like it was made in two minutes. A bunch of random pictures of...just stuff. Not in any specific order or layout. Just as if the maker of the game wanted something for the player to look at so he went through his pictures and splashed some all over the game randomly.
Secondly, the game is just not fun. I think the best way to make a game is to have it be fun to play. Otherwise, you just wasted time you could have spent doing something else. Now what I mean by it not being fun to play is that the game gives the player no drive or motivation to do anything. Hell, the game itself questions you if you want to play the game with the word "Play" with a question mark (which are everywhere for some reason) in the corner of the screen. When you actually start the game up there is no indicator that you are doing the right or wrong thing. No sound clip to indicate that you at least pressed the right button or anything. If it wasn't for a silent counter near the top of the screen I wouldn't have even known the game was working.
Third, the game works like one of those typing games from school that we used to play to learn finger placement. Not like this is necessarily bad, except for the fact that it seems like it is the only thing that works well in the game. Almost as if most of the thought was put into a single mechanic of the game and the rest was half-assed.
Again, I'm not saying this game is garbage. Because if I said that I would be a liar. I just think that there can be some improvement.

luciper2007 responds:

thanks! :D your comment really helps! thanks a lot.. I will consider about the three things you said...

[Flappy Bird Online]

The look of the game is spot on from the original mobile version. And the controls are simple and easy. The only problem is, at least with the computer I'm using, is the fact that it seems to be somewhat unresponsive. Other than that the game is fine. It is just Flappy Birds for the computer.